This chapter has a lot of stuff going on. I don’t understand it as a whole, but I do understand bits and pieces.
According to Flower, when put in practice, empowerment can mean several things depending on how you answer three questions: “Who is being empowered? To what end? By what means?” If you’re a poor person and excluded from power because you see that the rich and privileged have it all, then you will view empowerment differently from the privileged who are “developing their own capacity to resist, serve and act on the behalf of others (123).” You will also view empowerment differently if your goals are different and how you plan to reach those goals.
Flower says that “empowerment depends on speaking appropriately, speaking up, and speaking against as well as speaking with.” I believe by speaking appropriately you have to be willing to understand that there are cultural differences amongst us. You would speak to someone from Spain differently than you would to a middle class white man from Virginia. There are several differences amongst cultures, ethnic groups, classes and regions of the country and world. I understand Flowers notion of speaking up as being willing to speak your own “voice.” Your own ideas and understanding of society must come out in your writing and speech. Being willing to put yourself out there will hopefully help others begin to understand your ideas. This will start a conversation and lead to discussion and debate to hopefully create a larger understanding of society needs. Since this country has several cultures, we need to be able to speak against ideas in order to challenge and learn from them. By challenging others ideas and understandings, we can teach them new things, but also learn from others.
At this point in the chapter, I began to get more confused because Flowers tries to explain the problems with the above dependencies of empowerment. Anther option of speaking against ideas is to actually speak across differences. Use shared ideas to work together rather than the differences. Or, as Kurt Spellmeyer suggest, in composition classes “students are first recognized as meaning makers in their own right, involved in the work of reading and writing because it addresses questions that matter to them....the goal is not to preserve or transmit knowledge but to appropriate it—to use writing to discover what these differences mean for each individual.
Flowers then sites a study that tries to explain a theory of empowerment, that I don’t understand. What I would like to learn is how all of this works together as a whole text. What does it all mean?
Flower, Linda. Community Literacy and the Rhetoric of Public Engagement. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2008. Print